Researching the Earth's magnetic field

Author: Simon Lloyd

Earth Science afternoon

We were recently asked to give a talk for science day at St Michaels & All Angels Primary school on the Wirral. So, armed with all our gadgets and activities and a fun presentation, a team of four rose to the task. We ran two sessions, one each for year 3 and year 4 (the children were 8 – 9 years old) which consisted of a 10 minute talk followed by two activities running simultaneously. During the talk the children’s engagement and interest was clear; everyone hand was up at some point to either ask a question or provide a little story that they realised was in some way related.

One activity saw the children drawing Earth’s magnetic field lines and play with bar magnets to reproduce the field with rotating metal strips; they then got to explore the effect of the bar magnets on portable magnetometer measurements. They learned how the direction of the bar magnet changed the reading’s polarity and how the distance from the sensor affected the strength of the signal.

The other activity was ‘Rock or Choc’ which is always well received; here we use magnetic susceptibility meters to measure chocolates that look identical to pebbles and real pebbles. The kids have fun trying to work out the difference first. Everyone had a turn and received a chocolate pebble prize. A brilliant and rewarding afternoon some very clever future scientists.

Magnetic interactions 2023

This January, the University of Liverpool Geomagnetism group attended Magnetic Interactions 2023 hosted by the University of Cambridge. It was a really nice to attend this historic conference in person after the difficulties over the last two years, and we thank St Andrews University in the efforts of virtually hosting during this time. We had a strong showing and presented new research on Earth’s magnetic field spanning the last 2 million years to over a 2.5 billion years ago.

The first day’s talks focussed on the solar system and rock magnetism. Our section, on  Paleomagnetism and geomagnetism, started on the second morning with the first talk from Liverpool by Simon Lloyd who provided a current overview of the age of Earth’s inner core and presented new intensity data from the Cambrian era (530 million years) highlighting the complex and often (extremely!) weak magnetic field during this time.

Brendan Cych then presented on his recently submitted study on paleointensity results from Hawaii compared to global datasets, and provided some insights ways to get better quality results from the experiments. Mary Murray asked how wobbly the Earth’s magnetic field was ~60 million years ago? She presented primary data of the variation in magnetic field directions around this time, which may be related changes in Earth’s core. Andy Biggin rounded off our session by presenting new research on the two huge antipodal blobs of hot material in the lowermost mantle and whether these leave signatures in the palaeomagnetic field? These ‘large low velocity provinces’

We also had a strong poster presence; Yael Engbers presented on a model of the long-term time-averaged geomagnetic field for the Miocene era (5 – 23 Ma), which showed remarkable similarities to the last 5 Myrs. Alex Tully demonstrated the effectiveness of a new criterion, ‘Ziggie’, for improving the reliability of palaeointensity plots. Finally, our former colleague, now global colleague Dan Thallner made it across from the university of Florida to present a poster on his latest models. Thank you to Cambridge for hosting such a great (and fun) event!

Fieldwork in Orkney

In late October 2022 Simon headed to Orkney, Scotland to meet up in with researchers from the University of Oslo. The plan was to undertake a week of fieldwork as part of a large project headed by Annique Van der Boon (former Liverpool PDRA). There is lots of incredible geology in Orkney, and we were there to sample several important rocks:

1) Devonian aged volcanic rocks; 390 Ma rhyolite and younger more mafic volcanics that are 378 Ma.

2) Two sets of dykes which are different in composition and age; Camptonite 302 Ma and Monchiquite 280-284 Ma.

We did find and sample all of these targets, but we had the most success with the Camptonite dykes. These are really important because of their age; they formed and acquired their magnetisation during the Kiaman superchron, which is a period where Earth’s magnetic field was stuck in reverse for more than 50 million years. It was in a state of reversed polarity (North pole had flipped to the South pole) from ~262 to 318 Ma. Understanding this phenomena is an important part of Earth Science and the measurements of magnetic field direction and strength that we perform on these rocks will tell us about the deep earth processes that would need to exist to create this behaviour. Check out the amazing ariel photographs of the geology of Orkney!

PhD success

Congratulations to three of our PhD students, Yael, Dan and Simon, who celebrated receiving their doctorate today. All started and finished within a month of each other, and all were part of the DEEP project, ‘Determining Earth Evolution using Palaeomagnetism’. They produced some excellent research and publications during their time at Liverpool. Yael and Simon are staying on in PDRA positions whilst Dan is heading to Florida for a 3 year PDRA position in mantle core/ modelling. As you can see, at one point an old bewildered professor wondered into our shot (Oi! less of the old – Ed). A very enjoyable social evening hosted by Andy rounded the celebrations off perfectly.

Fieldwork in Canada!

It’s that chance for a Palaeomagnetist to get from behind the desk and into, perhaps, a part of the world they have not seen before. It’s a chance to see the ancient rocks in their natural environment and the opportunity to be at the very start of project at the data collection stage; the results of which will hopefully provide brand new information to the scientific community and indeed the world.

Why Canada?

This is part of a DEEP PhD project, in which we are trying to determine the strength of Earth’s ancient magnetic field at a time between 500 and 1000 million years ago. The first stage involves collecting rock samples from igneous events which occurred during this time period, many of which can be found in Canada.

The field trip concentrated on two small igneous plutons which were emplaced at around 530 million years ago, located in Chatham-Grenville and Mont Rigaud respectively. Within each area, we took samples from several sites (up to ten) in order to obtain a wide spread of samples, with GPS locations taken at  each of the sites as standard.

Later on, back at the laboratory, we will carry out palaeointensity analysis on the samples. The amount of magnetisation trapped in the rock is almost linearly related to the ancient magnetic field strength; because of this relationship, we are able obtain estimates for the strength of the ancient field.

A previous study had been carried out by Dr Phil McCausland in 2002 who, amongst other things, was interested in the ancient direction of the field. Where possible, we concentrated our efforts at known locations which gave good palaeodirection results. This was not easy because much had changed in the

When collecting samples, there are a number of considerations;

1) Because the remanence is only locked in to the rock as the rock cools below a certain temperature, the rock sample must also be kept cool whilst drilling it from the rock. The image below shows Phil McCausland drilling a sample from an outcrop whilst Daniele Thallner pumps water through the drill and out of the end to keep the sample cool.

2) The rock sample must be precisely orientated in x y and z, so that we can reproduce the orientation of the rock in the laboratory. This orientated reference frame is crucial if we want to determine the direction of the ancient geomagnetic field.

Below is an image of the sun compass used by the Liverpool Geomagnetism team. This is used to orientate the sample more accurately than using a magnetic compass with it’s associated errors (the compass needle can be deflected by the magnetic material within the rock when trying to measure).

The compass gets inserted and secured in place around the drilled core sample. First job is to make sure the spirit level bubble is centred. The compass only tilts forward and back so it must be rotated during this process; as a result, it is able to determine true inclination of the core sample. Because the bubble is centred, the compass is level in both x and y.

We take a sun sighting by turning the sun compass so that the sun casts a shadow though a small hole on to the fine line on the mirror, we then take a reading and record the time; this information is then put through some software to determine the X axis reading for the core sample. To obtain the Y axis reading, we simply add 90 degrees.

A magnetic compass reading of the X axis is also taken for comparison; this is achieved by aligning the sun compass with the dip direction of the core and placing a magnetic compass against the axis of the mirror.

The image below shows the X and Y axes over a plan view of the core sample/ specimen. Both are measured as east of North, or in other words as the angular distance from North in a clockwise direction.

A standard 1” core specimen is shown (above right) with the ‘z’ axis and direction marked on the side of the specimen. This has been cut from a core, and depending how deep we drilled, we might expect to get ~3 specimens per core.

This specific core is marked as SCG2-11A

SCG is the name of the area which includes several sites

2 is the designated site number

11 is the core number

A is the specimen designation from this core, followed by B etc.

From Chatham-Grenville, a total of 138 standard 1” core specimens were produced from 7 different sites, plus some hand samples from a further site will produce more specimens.

A total of 35 Hand samples from 10 different sites were collected from Mont Rigaud; these can be orientated, drilled and cut in the laboratory, albeit with slightly less accuracy, to produce several core from each hand sample, which are then divided into specimens.

 

Powered by WordPress & Theme by Anders Norén